Complete Communities and Indulgent Diversities Essays -- Campus Life

Rebekah Nathans Community and sort focuses on the changing definition of the word club on college campuses and how that sort affects the way students spend their free time and interact with other students. plot of land campus directors set up and promote campus life community with good intentions of providing every(prenominal) student with interesting activities and helping first-time students make the jump from home-life to college-life, big communities normally only take outside(a) from the little free time left wing in the day and make students feel more isolated and alone. The remove on students to participate in every campus activity in ordination to contrive a healthy campus life community pushes students further away from organized groups and makes forming small, exclusive social net profits even more desirable. At the head start of her essay Community and Diversity, Nathan notes most students only feel a star of togetherness in three aras age, pop culture, and a handful of (recent) historical events (Nathan 101)areas that do not exactly function as ties that bind. Even as campuses effuse more resources and energy into trying to involve students and to create a cognitive process community, many students instead opt to reserve time for themselves and small groups of friends, leave the large, time-restrictive group for networks of individualism, spontaneity, freedom, and choice (Nathan 105). While these egocentric groups often overlap, they rarely direct identical matches, as apiece student creates his or her own network on a basis of proximity and similar interests. Many of the groups are also either entirely comprised of a single ethnicity or complicate only one or two persons of different races. Although the large, organized form of campus... ...s purpose and motivationto provide social structure, to educate, or to merely persist in the majority of the freshman class? While a large-scale community can provide students with multiple activities with which to fill their days, it simply cannot offer each student much needed personal care and attention. Although Nathan conducts brilliant empirical research in her essay, Community and Diversity, she merely scratches the surface of the situation, reporting on the evidence around her, but not reaching the heart of problem. Students directly require a deeper understanding from other studentsan understanding they cannot have in a large community. Instead of waiting for small-scale university programming to puzzle along, students have to take matters, and their best interests, into their own hands and create small, backstage networks that cater to their individual needs.