.

Sunday, February 17, 2019

Essay on the Character of Katharina in Taming of the Shrew

The Character of Katharina in The Taming of the Shrew Michael W. Shurgot has written that The Taming of the Shrew may never be as intellectually stimulating as reading, say, The merchant of Venice or Hamlet or The Winters Tale and that the characters that seem one-dimensional on the page can unaccompanied become interesting on the ramification (328). Shurgot would seem to imply that Shakespeare did not fully develop his characters, and that the constitute is only entertaining after a director has taken creative independence with the stage directions. A close reading of the play itself will signal it to be interesting enough indeed, for it reveals clues to the motivation of both Katharinas termagantishness and later submissiveness, and the means in which her character is to be portrayed and viewed. Agnes Mure Mackenzie would have audiences believe that Katharinas insurrection is temperamental apparently at least we are given no reason for it in its beginnings, (24). Bap tista says that his daughters will have a good carry up, (1.1.99), implying that he has always tried to raise the girls right. Katharina, he would have us believe, has turned out shrewish despite his best intentions. He in like manner says that he intends to school his daughters. This does not necessarily mean that Katharina is intelligent, but she has in all likelihood been encouraged to think. Like it or not, Baptista has reared an independently thinking female. An audience index assume that Katharina has always been shrewish her reputation seems to have already been established, as is evidenced by Hortensio and Gremios heckling in the first scene (1.1.55-61). This does not mean she is a shrew by nature, only that she had been exhibiting this behavior f... ...hout his in time knowing it. So we see that Katharina is indeed a very manifold and interesting character. Generations of readers and performers have misunderstood her character, and probably misrepresented her. Tucking Katharina into the crazy shrew package may be very convenient for the director spirit for an easy production, but it is probably incorrect. In fact, no production that produces the play as a straightforward farce does the character of Katharina any justice. whole kit and caboodle Cited MacKenzie, Agnes Mure. The Women in Shakespeares Plays. London William Heinemann Ltd., 1924. circle. Was shrewish Shakespeare a feminist bard? from http//web.uvic.ca/ucom/Ring/99feb19/bard.htm Shurgot, Michael W. From Fiction to Reality Character and Stagecraft in The taming of the shrew. Theatre Journal, October 1981, 327-340.

No comments:

Post a Comment